5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Framework for anti-corruption objectives
ISO 37001
How to Answer the Question
To effectively explain the framework provided by the anti-corruption policy for setting, reviewing, and achieving anti-corruption objectives, focus on the following key aspects:
- Definition of Objectives: Describe how the policy defines clear and specific anti-corruption objectives, which might include prevention, detection, and response strategies.
- Review Mechanisms: Detail the mechanisms for periodic review of these objectives to ensure they remain relevant and effective against the backdrop of an evolving regulatory and business environment.
- Achievement Strategies: Explain the strategies and actions outlined in the policy to achieve these objectives, such as compliance training, internal audits, and enforcement protocols.
For comprehensive guidelines, consider referencing resources like the [Agence Française Anticorruption](https://www.agence-francaise-anticorruption.gouv.fr).
Why It's Important
The importance of a well-defined framework for anti-corruption objectives in the policy includes:
- Ensuring Relevance: Keeps the anti-corruption efforts aligned with both internal business practices and external legal requirements.
- Facilitating Measurement and Adjustment: Allows for the measurement of effectiveness and necessary adjustments to tackle corruption more efficiently.
- Promoting Accountability and Transparency: Enhances accountability and transparency within the organization, fostering a culture of integrity.
More about the importance of these elements can be explored at [International Anti-Corruption Academy](https://www.iaca.int).
Examples
- Example A:
- Context: A financial services firm includes specific objectives in its anti-corruption policy related to the monitoring and reporting of transactions to prevent money laundering.
- Resources Deployed: Compliance software and regular training sessions for all employees.
- Outcome: Improved detection of suspicious transactions and reduced risk of non-compliance with financial regulations.
For more information on compliance software, visit [OECD Guidelines](https://www.oecd.org).
- Example B:
- Context: A manufacturing company sets objectives focusing on supplier audits to prevent corruption in its supply chain.
- Resources Deployed: Third-party audit firms and an internal compliance team.
- Outcome: Enhanced supplier compliance with the company’s anti-corruption standards, leading to a more transparent and ethical supply chain.
Guidelines for setting up supplier audits can be found at [UNODC’s Anti-Corruption Policies](https://www.unodc.org).
Also in
Leadership
- 5.1.2 - Integration into management processes
- 5.1.2 - Communication strategies
- 5.1.2 - Promotion of anti-corruption culture
- 5.1.2 - Support for management functions
- 5.1.2 - Resource allocation for anti-corruption
- 5.1.2. - Anti-corruption communication strategies
- 5.1.2 - Promotion of reporting mechanisms
- 5.1.2 - Protection against retaliation
- 5.1.2 - Reporting to governing Body
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Explicit prohibition of corruption
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Compliance with laws
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Tailoring policy to organizational objectives
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Manifestation of commitment
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Encouragement of reporting
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Continuous improvement
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Compliance function authority
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Consequences for non-compliance
- 5.3.1 - Top management responsibility
- 5.3.1 - Assignment of responsibilities and authorities
- 5.3.1 - Managerial compliance
- 5.3.2 - Anti-bribery compliance function : Role and authority
- 5.3.2 - Anti-bribery compliance function : Resource allocation
- 5.3.2 - Access to governing body and top management