5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Consequences for non-compliance
ISO 37001
How to Answer the Question
When discussing the specified consequences for non-compliance with the anti-corruption policy, consider the following aspects:
- Explicit Penalties: Detail the specific penalties or disciplinary actions outlined in the policy for non-compliance, such as fines, suspension, or termination of employment.
- Legal Ramifications: Explain any legal consequences that could arise from non-compliance, which may include criminal charges or civil liabilities depending on the jurisdiction.
- Reputational Impact: Discuss the potential reputational damage to the organization and individuals involved in non-compliance cases.
Refer to enforcement examples in the [Agence Française Anticorruption](https://www.agence-francaise-anticorruption.gouv.fr) for detailed policy implementations.
Why It's Important
Understanding the consequences of non-compliance is critical because:
- Deters Misconduct: Clear and severe consequences help deter individuals and business units from engaging in corrupt practices.
- Ensures Policy Effectiveness: The threat of real penalties enhances the effectiveness of the compliance program by ensuring that the policies are taken seriously.
- Protects the Organization: It helps to protect the organization from legal risks and maintains its reputation by demonstrating a commitment to lawful and ethical conduct.
For broader context on the importance of defining consequences, consult resources like the [OECD Anti-Corruption Guidelines](https://www.oecd.org).
Examples
- Example A:
- Context: A corporation has established a tiered penalty system for non-compliance with its anti-corruption policy, ranging from written warnings for minor infractions to termination and legal action for major violations.
- Resources Deployed: Human Resources policies, legal advisory services.
- Outcome: Reduced incidents of non-compliance and enhanced culture of integrity within the organization.
Additional guidelines can be explored at [Global Compliance News](https://www.globalcompliancenews.com).
- Example B:
- Context: A tech company includes mandatory compliance training and automatic probation periods for any employee under investigation for breaches of the anti-corruption policy.
- Resources Deployed: Compliance training programs, monitoring and enforcement mechanisms.
- Outcome: High compliance rates and proactive engagement from employees in ethical practices.
For more on training and compliance, visit [Anti-Corruption Management System Guidelines by Eni SpA](https://www.eni.com).
Also in
Leadership
- 5.1.2 - Communication strategies
- 5.1.2 - Promotion of anti-corruption culture
- 5.1.2 - Support for management functions
- 5.1.2 - Resource allocation for anti-corruption
- 5.1.2. - Anti-corruption communication strategies
- 5.1.2 - Promotion of reporting mechanisms
- 5.1.2 - Protection against retaliation
- 5.1.2 - Reporting to governing Body
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Explicit prohibition of corruption
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Compliance with laws
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Tailoring policy to organizational objectives
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Framework for anti-corruption objectives
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Manifestation of commitment
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Encouragement of reporting
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Continuous improvement
- 5.2 - Anti-bribery policy : Compliance function authority
- 5.3.1 - Top management responsibility
- 5.3.1 - Assignment of responsibilities and authorities
- 5.3.1 - Managerial compliance
- 5.3.2 - Anti-bribery compliance function : Role and authority
- 5.3.2 - Anti-bribery compliance function : Resource allocation
- 5.3.2 - Access to governing body and top management
- 5.3.3 - Decision maker conflict of interest : Managing conflicts of interest